digg

Join DiggAbout

The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.

See the original image at designreviver.com —

50+ Excellent Body Enhancement Photoshop Tutorials

designreviver.com — Making a photograph of a person look amazing adds an extra dimension of professionalism to your design. These photoshop body enhancement tutorials will help you transform your people pictures to stunning models in next to no time. Most techniques involve similar use of the photoshop tools.

show profanity settings
expand all
  • damack, on 09/03/2008, -1/+60Alternatively titled: Why not to trust girls online with photoshop
  • fatabbot, on 09/03/2008, -17/+4Again?
    Looks like a rip of http://digg.com/design/33_Awesome_Body_Enhancement ...
    • netgeek06, on 09/03/2008, -0/+10This one includes few tutorials from the one you have mentioned doesn't mean it is a rip off.
    • bilirkishi, on 09/04/2008, -6/+1or
      Advanced Body Enhancement Photoshop Tutorials
      http://www.iyiz.com/33-advanced-body-enhancement-p ...
      • fatabbot, on 09/04/2008, -0/+9That site is pure content theft.
        All articles on there are literal copies from other websites and he even makes money from it.
      • GawtMilk, on 09/05/2008, -0/+1Thanks to the author this website, who let me know one of my tutorials was stolen.

        [fyi, I wrote these two tutorials linked from the site].

        http://onlinephototutorials.com/2008/07/25/whiten- ...
        http://onlinephototutorials.com/2008/07/25/removin ...

        However, this tutorial links to "mrmalique.com" who just copied the content from my website:

        http://www.mrmalique.com/index.php/tutorial-how-to ...

        EDIT: It appears that we just used the same stock image [I link to it in my article] and the same technique. Sorry. Glad to see it's not just a case of theivery, it really pisses me off when people steal other people's articles.

        Anyway.

        If anyone has a Photoshop tutorial they'd like me to write, that is NOT to do with those ***** "awesome button effect" 'design' tutorials, let me know - either on Digg, email, or using the 'request' form on my website.
    • OwdenBowden, on 09/04/2008, -0/+2Who cares. 10 minute abs, 7 minute abs, it is all the same
      • dacheetah, on 09/04/2008, -0/+2What about "6 minute abs"?
      • mrBitch, on 09/05/2008, -1/+1You walk into a video store, you see 8 minute abs sitting there and then you see 7 minute abs on the shelf right beside it.

        Which one are you gonna pick man?
  • DeskFlyer, on 09/04/2008, -5/+31This is why women feel compelled to wear tons of makeup when they don't need it.
  • skewl, on 09/04/2008, -13/+8Nice and Informative Article
  • Smilier, on 09/04/2008, -6/+1Lots of tutorials to follow, I can see now how come models look so good in posters etc
  • welshandproud, on 09/04/2008, -8/+8Great tutorials here. I'm getting better at Photoshop all the time :-)
  • SuperWinner, on 09/04/2008, -0/+47Why does that baby have a black eye???
  • Stuart750, on 09/04/2008, -0/+21"Improving The Face Using Symmetry"; for those of you who drop toddlers on their faces.
  • carve, on 09/04/2008, -8/+2Why are all the photoshop tutorials on digg special-effects or graphics based, rather than how to realistically enhance a real photo to better convey reality?
    • KSUdesigner, on 09/04/2008, -1/+3What? Why would you have to enhance a real photo to convey reality? A real photo is just a snapshot of reality. Altering a photo does not convey reality.
      • dacheetah, on 09/04/2008, -0/+2Good tweaking of brightness and contrast, and removing glare or reflections can help make a photo look more like what you would see in real life, cameras and eyes are different, and don't capture quite the same information (particularly if a flash is used leaving an unwanted refelction or a lens flare is created.)
      • carve, on 09/05/2008, -0/+1A photo is not a snapshot of reality. It is data (or oxidized chemicals). Dacheetah nailed it. Cameras don't see the same as an eye. Eyes automatically adjust for color balance, have a wider dynamic range, know if the interest is in the highlights or the shadows, aren't cropped, don't have a flat, washed out look if the settings aren't right, and see in 3-D. Very few photos are as good as they can be straight out of the camera. What you're looking that then is the settings that WHOEVER PROGRAMMED THE CAMERA thought would most closely convey reality, on average, over all conditions.
      • KSUdesigner, on 09/05/2008, -0/+1Well you're both right, but I don't think those were the type of things that he was implying.
  • Aslan72, on 09/04/2008, -0/+25How about "Photoshop tutorials by people who don't use photoshop"...seriously, some of their 'afters' look like D or F material.



    • jpowlus, on 09/04/2008, -0/+10No kidding... Those are some of the laziest, sloppiest tuts I've seen. For the "remove lovehandles" one, they basically just drew a path and deleted the fat roll. No patching the shading, nothing. Looks fake as hell.
  • solemnraven, on 09/04/2008, -0/+215 comments, and i need a dugmirror already? seriously??
  • malechite, on 09/04/2008, -0/+3Down already. Mirror?
    • acis1, on 09/04/2008, -0/+28Mirrors are what caused women to start this ***** in the first place.
  • jbeardsl, on 09/04/2008, -1/+9Can someone photoshop some bigger tubes on to this website? Sigh...
  • saltydawkins, on 09/04/2008, -3/+12Alternatively titled: How to destroy an entire generation's self esteem
  • AssShanks, on 09/04/2008, -2/+5Great, cuz I have 50+ things about me I'd like to fix.
  • rocko66, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1Mirror... plz?
  • theshoreways, on 09/04/2008, -2/+1"Adding beards and stubble"
  • Stealer, on 09/04/2008, -1/+6should be called: how to make your creepy photos look simply ugly.
  • MaddieCakes, on 09/04/2008, -0/+4I don't think any of the ones with picture examples looked very good... The goal of photo enhancement isn't to airbrush things into oblivion, it's supposed to look natural. A lot of those didn't look natural at all.
  • shrubbery, on 09/04/2008, -1/+2i didn't get past the list. did anyone else thing every one of those example 'shops looked worse than the original?
  • Greg2k, on 09/04/2008, -3/+2PHOTOSHOPPED
  • TrevorBelmont, on 09/04/2008, -1/+7Photos are always better when you can get rid of all that irritating human individuality.
  • violetice, on 09/04/2008, -1/+2There really needs to be a "how not to abuse the smudge tool" tutorial. Seriously, the one for removing arm hair just left the arm all white and streaky.
  • Shurayuki, on 09/04/2008, -0/+0-goes to doctor photos-
  • SoundJudgment, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1All that 'face work' on the first subject... yet nothing was done about her hair??
  • Groggie, on 09/04/2008, -0/+4That is the most fake looking stubble ever. And that baby looks like an alien after the retouching- the eyes are different distances from the nose!
  • larasho, on 09/04/2008, -1/+1great tutorials
  • dabura, on 09/04/2008, -2/+1Gimped.
  • se7en11, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1Why are they trying to hide the bruised eye?

    http://www.photoshoptalent.com/photoshop-tutorials ...
    http://designreviver.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/0 ...
  • court2408, on 09/04/2008, -0/+7Alternate Title: What not to do if you want a career in graphic design.
    Seriously... The after images are horrible.
    • TheKingInYellow, on 09/04/2008, -0/+2unless you want your work to be seen on photoshopdisasters.com. i can't believe people actually get paid to screw up that bad when people like me with an actual design degree can't find a real design job.
  • mattdxy, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1A good list of corrective techniques but must say I was quite disappointed with the techniques. It's mostly for beginners. Still a helpful post though.
  • Cyrock, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1not bad for doing photochops on genmay or 4chan ect... but not for professional use.
  • physicalzero, on 09/04/2008, -0/+8AKA "Covering up your child abuse with Photoshop"
  • bgl2k3, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1so... basically just blur the hell out of everything... excellent.
  • TheKingInYellow, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1more like:
    creepy body photoshop tutorials
  • sydsampat, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1Hmm. That was quite disappointing. Those 'after' pictures are amateur at best. Buried for being generic and low quality
  • hobo343, on 09/04/2008, -0/+2after you beat your child senseless, you can remove any trace of bruising with the magic of photoshop!

    http://designreviver.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/0 ...
  • eon42, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1lol... body enhancement....
  • proficient, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1Noice.
  • 7aji, on 09/04/2008, -0/+3funny, I do retouching for living and yesterday I had a picture where a woman wanted her boobs look bigger (no kidding) I felt bad for her because she is feeling this way. I'm with with a light retouching, but totally changing your look reflects some insecurities inside the preson.
    • mattdxy, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1I hear you. We do weddings and personally, since I think a woman's beauty is amplified by her bridal attire, all brides are beautiful. It's really is sad to hear that some of our clients don't mind at all if we shrink them from a size 10 to a size 4. We don't do anything this drastic though. We try to preserve memories and people in it as they really are--just a tad prettier.

      With magazines and fashion however, I totally agree with making it look as perfect as possible, however, there still has to be a line drawn between doing it just right and overkill. Otherwise too perfect makes it unbelievable and unrelatable.
      • ryusen, on 09/04/2008, -0/+1you always want to fix things a little bit, but in many cases it's the imperfections that add character.
    • ryusen, on 09/04/2008, -0/+0i have had one or two requests for digital boob jobs. the ones i got were more just curiosity than anything else.
  • kurupttek, on 09/04/2008, -1/+4What do you tell a women with two black eyes?



    Nothing she was already told twice!

    http://www.instantrimshot.com/
  • bravefire, on 09/04/2008, -0/+0I think alot of these are overdone...not subtle nor realistic.
  • flairmaster, on 09/05/2008, -0/+0Totally awesome! Finally a Photoshop tutorial you really use :)
  • iwasnevy, on 09/05/2008, -0/+1This is a great collection of just about the worst tutorials I've ever seen! There's much better ways to do just about each thing in these tutorials.
  • Shenaniganz08, on 09/05/2008, -0/+1Those are pretty ***** results
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.